9/11 – A Cheap Magic Trick

April Gallop is a young mother and former career Army Officer who worked in that section of the Pentagon that was destroyed on 9/11.

On the morning of 9/11 Gallop went to work as usual. Her desk was roughly 40 feet from the point where the plane allegedly hit the outside wall. Her supervisor wanted her to start work immediately so instead of dropping her baby off at childcare she placed his carrier next to her desk.

As she sat down there was an explosion, then another; walls collapsed and the ceiling fell in. Hit in the head, she was still able to grab her baby and make her way towards the daylight showing through a blasted opening in the outside wall. There was no airplane wreckage and no burning airplane fuel anywhere; only rubble and dust. She now believes that a bomb went off inside the building.

Later, while recuperating in the hospital, she was visited by government agents who tried to persuade her of what she had heard, seen and felt on 9/11. Despite their promptings, Gallop remained steadfast in describing what she and her child experienced that day.

As a result of the injuries she and her child suffered on 9/11 and her own questions about the ‘official theory’ of what happened at the Pentagon, she filed a lawsuit against Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers and other officials for their possible role in the attack and failure to evacuate the Pentagon. The lawsuit cites Flight Data Recorder Analysis undertaken by Pilots for 9/11 Truth and other information. You can read the entire lawsuit by clicking on the link.http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=15787

In George Orwell’s masterpiece, Nineteen Eighty-Four, Emmanuel Goldstein is the nemesis of Big Brother even though he is never seen or heard. Invented by the inner party, he provides the false opposition needed to justify their actions.

Bin Laden plays a similar role in the fiction of 9/11.

Who is Osama Bin Laden and is he even alive?

Osama Bin Ladin, also known as Tim Osman – was a long standing asset of the CIA and was recruited by them in the 1980′s to help drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan. A Saudi by birth, Bin Laden created a ragtag group of dissidents called Al Qaeda. Bin Laden was later charged in connection with the 1998 bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya.

After 9/11, the Bush administration blamed Bin Laden and Al Qaeda for the attack. That link provided the justification for bombing Afghanistan. However the FBI never listed 9/11 as Bin Laden’s work and when questioned about it, Rex Tomb, the FBI’s Chief of Investigative Publicity, is reported to have said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” Sibel Edmonds, who worked as a translator for the FBI, has also stated in her deposition that the US government had a close working relationship with Bin Laden right up until 9/11.

There is also the question of whether or not Bin Laden is still alive. In 2001 he was suffering from renal failure. Various reports out of Pakistan stated that he died in December 2001. Click here to read a newspaper article on the subject. Or click here for a more recent article.

In 2007, Pakistani Premier Benazir Bhutto also stated that Osama bin Laden was dead. Shortly afterwards she was assassinated.

Irregardless, Bin Laden lives on in videos that appear whenever the American public is not sufficiently terrified. Like Emmanuel Goldstein, he has become a part of a continuing nightmare.

“…of course….In the end, Goldstein implies that “the war” might not exist; the Oceanian populace know the external world solely via the Party’s propaganda, and that the rocket bombings, ostensibly by “the enemy”, might be self-inflicted (as Julia suggests), therefore, “the war” is a lie. Moreover, it might possibly be that Eurasia and Eastasia are fabrications, and that Oceania is the sole world power. In such ambiguity is the meaning of perpetual war: internal subjugation disguised as defence against foreign subjugation, the theory and practice of oligarchical collectivism…”

- 1984, George Orwell

One of the things our rulers count on is that members of the public have a short attention span which makes them reliant on others to make the connection between past, present, and future events. For example, notice the similarities between the bombing of the Federal Building and the 9/11 attacks.

Both involved bombings and the use of explosives.

In the case of 9/11, among the explosives used were highly sophisticated materials produced by the US military and contractors working for the Department of Defense. Unconventional military grade explosives were probably also used in the Oklahoma City bombing.

Both involved identification of the event with a single individual who became the face of the enemy. In the case of Oklahoma, it was white working class males. In the case of 9/11, it was Muslims.

Both evidenced government complicity not only in the event but in the cover up.

Both involved early identification of the supposed perpetrators even though it usually takes government agencies months or even years to find the perpetrators of ordinary murders.

Both events led to no independent investigation of what actually happened.

Both events led to the immediate removal of the rubble with no independent forensic investigation. In the case of 9/11, the WTC rubble was shipped off to China to be desposed of.

Both events led to the further limitations of civil liberties in America and demonization of those who opposed the growth of government power.

Both events and their interpretation were only made possible because of the media’s complicity in telling and selling the government’s version of events.

On April 19, 1995, Timothy McVeigh detonated a truck full of ammonium nitrate, nitromethane, and diesel fuel in front of the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City. When it happened it was the worst terrorist act ever committed on American soil and one that cost the lives of 168 people and injured 680 more.

But like 9/11, there were multiple problems with the ‘official story’. One problem was that the truck bomb alone couldn’t have created the amount of damage that occurred that morning. According to an unofficial report prepared by Brigadier General Benton K. Partin, there had to have been other bombs planted in the building.

In addition the Alfred P. Murrah Building was deemed a Level 4 building. (A Level 5 building is a maximum security building.) Witnesses reported heard multiple bombs go off and undetonated bombs were later found inside the building. So how did McVeigh plant additional bombs inside a secure Federal building that housed the Social Security Administration, FBI, DEA, BATF, and offices for both the Army and Marine Corps?

As with 9/11, one has to look for a political motive behind the bombing. America’s ruling elite needed to defuse the growing anti-government movement in the country after Waco and Ruby Ridge. They needed a horrific event linked to someone who looked like those in the militia movement: namely white working class males. Timothy McVeigh fit the bill. Like Osama Bin Laden, McVeigh became the personification of evil in the media. A man who was willing to murder women, men and children in cold blood. And by implication, so was every member of the militia movement.

But the question to ask is who benefited from the Oklahoma City bombing? Was it the militia movement or was it the Federal Government with the further expansion of its power?

The feature story in Silicon Valley’s number one weekly newspaper on September 9, 2009, summarizes many of the questions about the official version of what happened on 9/11. According to the article:

Just a few years ago Ed Munyak, a fire protection engineer for the city of San Jose, seemed like a lonely, out-there figure, a sometimes-target because of his outspoken position on the events of Sept. 11, 2001. These days, hundreds of other building trade professionals have joined him in challenging the official narrative about the collapse of three buildings at New York’s World Trade Center (WTC) on that fateful, traumatic day.

Munyak, of Los Altos Hills, is a mechanical and fire engineer whose job is to review building plans to ensure they comply with the California Building and Fire Code. In 2007, after speaking out on his own for a few years, Munyak signed on with a then-fledging organization called Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth (AE911 Truth), founded by Bay Area architect Richard Gage.

Richard Gage, Architect and Founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

In the article Munyak states that

“Buildings do not fail from fire related causes in the way that World Trade Center 1, 2 and 7 failed. Steel frame or composite steel buildings, modern high-rise buildings—they just do not collapse catastrophically like that. It’s impossible.

“Only if you sever columns in some other way will those buildings collapse. It takes too much energy, and that energy was not there even with adding in all that jet fuel. It defies all engineering analysis and theory that those buildings collapsed in that manner. It just doesn’t make any sense.”

Click here to read Richard Gage’s explosive theory.

How were we tricked on 9/11?

The planes that hit the World Trade Center buildings were a diversion from the real cause of their collapse: explosives planted in the buildings – tons of explosives. Our attention was drawn to the planes, of course, because videos of them hitting the buildings were shown over and over again on television in order to imprint them on our memory. Coupled with these videos were ‘instant experts’ who immediately appeared on television and in the print medium to tell us who carried out the crime. These experts reinforced the ‘official version’ of events by reiterating the same story over and over and by adding to the story as new pieces of information were ‘revealed’ to the public.

The damage at the Pentagon was of a similar nature. In all likelihood what happened was that explosives were planted in that part of the building where the plane was supposed to hit. Witnesses did see a plane headed for the Pentagon but the preplanted explosives went off just shortly before the plane arrived – thus giving the illusion that the plane had actually hit the building. Most witnesses were so mesmerized by the explosions that they never saw the plane fly through the smoke and over the building.

Notice that the same illusion was used in both Washington and New York. A diversion was created (the plane) while the real cause of the death and destruction was explosives. These explosives could only have been planted by those who had access to not only the explosives but to the buildings themselves.

That leaves the plane that went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania to be explained. The plane had a target – probably building 7 in New York – but the plane had to be destroyed because something went wrong. Without a real investigation, it is difficult to say what happened to the plane and its passengers.

Everyone loves watching a skilled magician. They are able to misdirect us long enough to carry out tricks that amuse and astound us. Our leaders also understand magic and are able to construct large scale magic tricks that mold public opinion and justify their subsequent actions.

9/11 was an example of this.

What is magic anyway? Most magic tricks are performed using distraction and misdirection of the audience’s attention. For example, if a magician wants to do a card trick he will often look in a different direction than his hands knowing the audience will follow suit. While looking elsewhere, the trick is performed.

On 9/11 magic was used to trick the public into thinking that the events of that day happened exactly as we were told by the government and by the media despite the fact that the story made no sense once the shock of the day’s events had worn off. Prepared statements were given to the media and to government officials to set the stage for what was to become the ‘official story line’. Operatives were on the streets and ready to be interviewed in order to misdirect the public’s attention regarding who was to blame. Within 3 days the FBI had supposedly identified all 19 hijackers even though it took them months to identify those who had actually died in the attacks. Video warnings from Osama Bin Laden, a long time CIA operative, were aired on television in order to help us visualize the enemy.

The trick worked for awhile. In shock over what had happened, Americans were easily led to believe the 9/11 magic act despite the fact that it violated common sense, several laws of physics, and the testimony of survivors. As more time has gone by, however, it has become easier to see that we were duped on 9/11 and that those who tricked us were the same ones who carried out the event.

Sibel Edmons is a whistleblower who refused to be silenced by Congress despite a gag order. In this video testimony she discusses the involvement of US , Israeli, and Turkish officials in nuclear trafficking and the selling of America’s secrets to the highest bidder.

Central in this story is Marc Grossman who was Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs for George Bush and a former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey. Grossman currently works as a Vice President of the Cohen Group. This company was founded by William S. Cohen, the former Secretary of Defense, and is involved in lobbying, marketing, and capital formation.

Others in Washington guilty of accepting bribes or of being blackmailed into betraying their country include Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-OH); Ex-Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert (R-IL); Rep. Roy Blunt (R-MO); Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN); Rep. Tom Lantos (D-CA); Ex-Speaker of the House, Rob Livingston (R-LA); Rep. Stephen Solarz (D-NY); Richard Perle; Douglas Feith; Eric Edelman; Brent Scowcroft; and Larry Franklin.

Sibel Edmonds came by this knowledge when she worked as a translator for the FBI. Edmonds was later fired from her position as a language specialist after she accused a colleague of covering up illicit activity involving foreign nationals, alleging serious acts of security breaches, cover-ups, and intentional blocking of intelligence which, she contended, presented a danger to the United States’ security.

Click on the link below to watch part of her deposition.

deposition-video-clip-sibel-edmonds-%e2%80%93-nuclear-trafficking-us-turkish-officials-rand

You can also read an article recently published in the American Conservative Magazine on Edmonds by clicking on this link Who’s Afraid of Sibel Edmonds?

Because the world’s gangster elite are in league with each other, they often use operatives from different countries in order to stage terrorist events. The arrangement seems to be that if they need a ‘terrorist’ event in their country they employ operatives controlled by the mob in another country and when their counterparts need an event, the favor is repaid.

For example, 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta’s handler was a German CIA agent. The money used to finance the 9-11 attacks came from General Mahmoud Ahmad, the head of Pakistani intelligence. Interestingly enough, on the morning of 9/11 Ahmad was meeting with the chairmen of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees Sen Bob Graham and Rep Porter Goss. Also present at the meeting were Sen. John Kyl and the Pakistani ambassador to the U.S., Maleeha Lodhi.

Israeli agents also had a prominent role in the 9/11 operation. Israeli firms were in charge of security at the WTC and airports on 9-11. Vans filled with box cutters and traces of explosives were running all over New York on 9/11. It turns out they were owned by Urban Moving Systems, a Mossad front company in New York. Israeli agents were also seen filming and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center towers. They had set up their cameras in advance of the attacks and were filming themselves with the exploding buildings as a backdrop while they flicked cigarette lighters and laughed. They were later arrested, interrogated and then sent back to Israel where they bragged about their activities on Israeli television. Click on the link below to see the interview.
videoplay?docid=9193280622811817989#

People in other countries have commented on who really carried out 9/11 but these comments have never been repeated in the mainstream American media. For example, in November 2007, Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga told Italy’s oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge among global intelligence agencies. According to what Cossiga told the newspaper Corriere della Sera:

“All the [intelligence services] of America and Europe…know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part … in Iraq [and] Afghanistan.”

The American public remains ignorant of what the rest of the world knows because the same people who planned and carried out the attacks also control the media. Americans live in a country where information is as tightly controlled as it was in the former Soviet Union.

9/11 needs to be seen within the context of a continuing theme in history. Namely that war is just a business for those who profit from the death industry: namely the international bankers, dynastic families scattered throughout the world, and the people they employ.

Writing about this topic was Anthony Sutton. A British-born economist, historian, and writer, Sutton studied at the universities of London, Goettingen and California and received his D.Sc. degree from University of Southampton, England.

While working as a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution from 1968 to 1973 he wrote the major study Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development (in three volumes), detailing how the West played a major role in developing the Soviet Union from its very beginnings up until the present time (1970). He was forced out of the Hoover Institute after publishing National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union in 1973.

Sutton’s next three major published books Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler and Wall Street and FDR detailed Wall Street’s involvement in the Russian Revolution as well as its decisive contributions to the rise of Adolf Hitler and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. His books became classics in the study of covert politics and economics in the twentieth century. In Sutton’s own words he was “persecuted but never prosecuted” for his research and subsequent publication of his findings.

In the early 1980s, Sutton used publicly available information on Skull and Bones membership (such information is available, among other places, in Yale yearbooks) to speculate about political and economic relationships underlying significant historical events and about what he regarded as the purposes of these relationships. He published these conclusions as America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull and Bones– which, according to Sutton, was his most important work.

Click on the link below to watch an interview of Sutton. Be forewarned that while the video is of immense importance, it is of poor quality.

videoplay?docid=5420313553329356036&ei=1nGiSsjxM4SwrAPIj8XOBA&q=the+best+enemy+money+can+buy&hl=en#