Skip to content

9/11 – A Cheap Magic Trick

How false flag attacks are manufactured by the world's elite.

Archive

Archive for October, 2009

The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
KEVIN R. RYAN
July 2, 2008

“Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? . . . NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.” — NIST Responses to FAQs, August 2006

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has had considerable difficulty determining a politically correct sequence of events for the unprecedented destruction of three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on 9/11 (Douglas 2006, Ryan 2006, Gourley 2007). But despite a number of variations in NIST’s story, it never considered explosives or pyrotechnic materials in any of its hypotheses. This omission is at odds with several other striking facts; first, the requirement of the national standard for fire investigation (NFPA 921), which calls for testing related to thermite and other pyrotechnics, and second, the extensive experience NIST investigators have with explosive and thermite materials.

One of the most intriguing aspects of NIST’s diversionary posture has been their total lack of interest in explosive or pyrotechnic features in their explanations. Despite the substantial evidence for the use of explosives at the WTC (Jones 2006, Legge and Szamboti 2007), and the extensive expertise in explosives among NIST investigators (Ryan 2007), explosives were never considered in the NIST WTC investigation. Only after considerable criticism of this fact did NIST deign to add one small disclaimer to their final report on the towers, suggesting they found no evidence for explosives.

Kevin Ryan

Kevin Ryan


The extensive evidence that explosives were used at the WTC includes witness testimony (MacQueen 2006), overwhelming physical evidence (Griffin 2005, Hoffman et al 2005, Jones and Legge et al 2008) and simple common sense (Legge 2007). There is also substantial evidence that aluminothermic (thermite) materials were present at the WTC (Jones 2007), and the presence of such materials can explain the existence of intense fire where it would not otherwise have existed. Additionally, despite agreement from all parties that the assumed availability of fuel allowed for the fires in any given location of each of the WTC buildings to last only twenty minutes (NIST 2007), the fires lasted much longer and produced extreme temperatures (Jones and Farrer et al 2008).

These inexplicable fires are a reminder that the WTC buildings were not simply demolished, but were demolished in a deceptive way. That is, the buildings were brought down so as to make it look like the impact of the planes and the resulting fires might have caused their unprecedented, symmetrical destruction. Therefore, shaped charges and other typical explosive configurations were likely used, but there was more to it than that. Those committing the crimes needed to create fire where it would not have existed otherwise, and draw attention toward the part of the buildings where the planes impacted (or in the case of WTC 7, away from the building altogether).

Click here to read the rest of the article on the top ten connections between NIST and nano-thermites.

Read more on the Explosive Truth about the WTC Destruction

Larry A. Silverstein, a Jewish real estate tycoon, signed a lease on the World Trade Center complex on July 24, 2001, only six weeks before the towers were destroyed in the September 11 attacks.

JP Morgan Chase and the New York Port Authority, both of which are controlled by the Rockefeller family, negotiated the deal. Silverstein heavily insured the WTC complex against any terrorist attacks and received a $4.55 billion settlement after they were destroyed.

Silverstein also owned Building Seven in the WTC complex. Occupants of the secure building included the IRS, US Secret Service, the CIA, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Mayor’s office of Emergency Management.

Silverstein’s role as a co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 was confirmed when in a September 2002 PBS documentary he admitted giving the order to have Building Seven demolished. In an interview he said:

“I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”

click on the link to see the video excerpt

Why would Silverstein destroy his own buildings? One reason is the money. His lease on the WTC complex only cost him a down-payment of $124 million. The asbestos filled buildings would have cost billions to clean up but were conveniently destroyed by ‘evil terrorists’ which then allowed him to collect the $4.55 billion settlement. Silverstein is also a staunch Zionist with strong connections to three of Israel’s prime ministers including Benjamin Netanyahu, Ariel Sharon and Ehud Barak. Silverstein is especially close to Benjamin Netanyahu who was in New York on the morning of 9/11 and who fathered the “war on terror” doctrine. Netanyahu later went on to publicly say that the September 11, 2001 terror attacks had been beneficial for Israel. ”

We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq,” Ma’ariv quoted the former prime minister as saying. He reportedly added that these events “swung American public opinion in our favor.”

Not widely reported in the Amercan media was the fact that on 9/11, Mossad agents were running around Manhattan in vans loaded with box cutters and explosives. Other Israeli agents were arrested after being seen filming the destruction of the WTC and celebrating. (Click on the link to read the article) These Israelis were interrogated and then sent home with no charges filed. They later went on Israeli television and bragged how they had been sent to ‘document’ the event. That of course raises the question of how they knew what was going to happen unless they were part of making it happen. (Click to watch video clip)

Read more on the Explosive Truth about the WTC destruction


Controlling the oil in the Middle East and in Central Asia was the main goal behind the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. Oil provides the energy needed to maintain first world living standards in America, Britain, and other Western countries. More importantly oil backs the use of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. Without oil and now the opium fields in Afghanistan, the American dollar would be worthless paper and America’s role as a world superpower would be over.

The rhetoric aimed at Iran and Venezuela is of a similar nature. Both are oil rich countries that are threatening to trade their oil in currencies other than the dollar. Doing so would undermine the dollar and the American empire. The bankers on Wall Street and politicians/military leaders in Washington have no intention of allowing that to happen. That’s why 9/11 was engineered. That’s why another 9/11 false flag terrorist attack will be engineered in order to justify attacking first Iran and then Venezuela.

Below is a short video on this topic. Click to watch a short video on the subject:


Read more on the Explosive Truth about the WTC destruction

On 9/11 the American public went into shock as the day’s events unfolded. Extremely vulnerable to suggestion and lacking any independent sources of information, we passively accepted the government’s version of :

what happened
who was responsible
and what our response should be

Those few people who did raise questions were instantly labeled as crazy, unpatriotic, or, as George Bush put it, “with the terrorists.” Doing so ensured that no real debate would occur and people would self-censor themselves in order not to appear to be accomplices to murder.

But ask some basic questions. The picture on the left is of a high rise steel frame building in Madrid that caught fire in 2005 and burned for over 12 hours. That’s what a building on fire looks like. When the fire was finally put out, what remained of the building is pictured on the right. Guess what? The steel frame remained intact, there were no billowing clouds of concrete, and the building didn’t collapse.

In contrast, on 9/11 the World Trade Center towers were smoking but not on fire.

The fires were so minimal in fact that in one of the buildings, a woman is seen standing in the opening left by the plane.

Firefighters in the buildings also reported to their superiors that they thought they could knock the fire down with a few water lines.

Yet within two hours of being stuck, both buildings collapsed. No steel frame was left. No stacks of concrete floors remained. The buildings were reduced to dust and a few cut beams.

Read more on the Explosive Truth about the WTC destruction

Better Tag Cloud