Skip to content

9/11 – A Cheap Magic Trick

How false flag attacks are manufactured by the world's elite.

Archive

Archive for February, 2010

Anti-war groups have long been regarded as deliberate gatekeepers to the 9/11 Truth (and anti-war) movement.

But in 2009 Veterans for Peace membership mushroomed with savvy new members who realized it wasn’t enough to protest the war if you didn’t protest the government lie that allowed it to happen.

Below is a video of the resolution passed at the 2009 Conference of the group. The resolution supports an independent and valid investigation of the events of 9/11.

In John Perkins’ book, Confessions of an Economic Hitman, Perkins describes how the American empire was created at the behest of the international bankers and multinational corporations which he calls the corporatocracy.

Perkins’ job for the corporatocracy was to be an ‘economic hitman’. He was hired to persuade the leaders of different governments to take out huge loans to build large infrastructure projects in their countries. These leaders would, in turn, get substantial kickbacks for agreeing to these projects. Then multinational corporations like Bechtel and Halliburton would get the building contracts and the banks would earn billions in interest payments. Meanwhile the population in these countries got the bill which impoverished rather than benefited them.

In those countries where the leaders would not play ball, the ‘jackals’ were called in. These were CIA contractors who would either forment a revolution to depose the current leader or would arrange for the leader to die in an ‘accident’. In the video below, Perkins describes how he was recruited into being an economic hitman and what his job was.

In this second video, Perkins discusses why America attacked Iraq and Afghanistan and why it has plans to attack other oil rich countries such as Iran and Venezuela.

Richard Gage is an architect and founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

He is one of the foremost leaders in the 9/11 truth movement who has given presentations throughout the United States and the world on what really brought down the World Trade Center towers.

Below is a video presentation on his program:
Blueprint for Truth. The Architecture of Destruction.

Click on the link to see the rest of the presentation.

Click here to watch the rest of the videos.

Read more on the Explosive Truth about the WTC Destruction

On February 19th, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth held a press conference to announce that over 1,000 architects and engineers had signed a petition to Congress demanding that a new independent investigation be conducted regarding the events of 9/11.

This global media event was simultaneously hosted in over 47 locations including cities in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Europe.

Below is the broadcast from Victoria by Canadian members of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Click here for a newspaper article on the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth press conference.

Forget the claims and allegations that false flag terror – governments attacking people and then blaming others in order to create animosity towards those blamed – has been used throughout history.

This essay will solely discuss government admissions to the use of false flag terror.

For example:

•The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950’s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected president

•Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed)

•The well-respected former Indonesian president admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings

•The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this)(Italy joined NATO in 1949, years before the bombings occurred)

•As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960’s, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings*

Click here for the rest of the article on how governments admit carrying out false flag terror.

The Chattering Classes

by Elizabeth Woodworth

February 15, 2010
GlobalResearch.ca

Abstract

In the past year, in response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 attacks, nine corporate, seven public, and two independent media outlets aired analytic programs investigating the official account.

Increasingly, the issue is treated as a scientific controversy worthy of debate, rather than as a “conspiracy theory” ignoring science and common sense.

This essay presents these media analyses in the form of 18 case studies.

Eight countries – Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Russia – have allowed their publicly-owned broadcasting stations to air the full spectrum of evidence challenging the truth of the official account of 9/11.

This more open approach taken in the international media – I could also have included the Japanese media – might be a sign that worldwide public and corporate media organizations are positioning themselves, and preparing their audiences, for a possible revelation of the truth of the claim that forces within the US government were complicit in the attacks – a revelation that would call into question the publicly given rationale for the military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

The evidence now being explored in the international media may pave the way for the US media to take an in-depth look at the implications of what is now known about 9/11, and to re-examine the country’s foreign and domestic policies in the light of this knowledge.

I. Introduction

Until 2009, doubts about the official 9/11 story were briefly entertained by the mainstream media on each anniversary of the event, allowing the independent research community only a fleeting moment once a year to publicly voice its findings.

But after crucial scientific evidence emerged in April 2009 to challenge the official story of how the towers fell, a spate of European media reports followed. The news coverage of this evidence seems to have opened the door to more serious reflection on all aspects of the 9/11 issue in the major media.

The first paper in my series, “The Media Response to 9/11,” dealt with the New Statesman’s grudging recognition of Dr. David Ray Griffin, the world’s “top truther” (as it dubbed him), placing him number 41 among “The 50 People Who Matter Today.”1 Since this admission in September 2009, the issue has gathered increasing momentum.

The collective content issuing from this new momentum is presented here in the hope that it will embolden other major media to take up the pivotal controversy concerning 9/11, and pursuing the truth wherever it may lead.

Click here to read the rest of the article on the growing influence of the 9/11 truth movement.

There are many links between Israeli operatives and 9/11. One of the most important is that of an Israeli-owned company called International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) International N.V.

ICTS is a Netherlands-based aviation and transportation security firm headed by former Israeli military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies.

ICTS was responsible for airport security at three of the four airports that the hijacked airlines departed from on 9/11.

UAL Flight 175 and AA 11, which struck the twin towers in New York, both originated at Logan International Airport in Boston, while UAL 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, departed from Newark International airport.

(The plane that purportedly hit the Pentagon left from Dulles International airport. Their security was handled by Securacom. The same company in charge of electronic security at the World Trade Center towers and the same company with Marvin Bush on its board of directors.)

Click here to read more.

No videos were ever released showing the hijackers boarding the planes in Boston or Newark. Nor did any of the passenger lists on the hijacked planes include any Arab names. Further, after the FBI released the names of the supposed hijackers, several of them showed up alive and well. Click here for the article regarding the hijackers. Yet the government has never changed its story about who was on those planes.

The dastardly shoe bomber Richard Reid.


The underwear bomber

Since 9/11, ICTS has been involved in other incidents involving ‘terrorists’. Richard Reid, the ‘shoe bomber’, was allowed by ICTS to board a plane at Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris and fly to Miami in December 2001. More recently, America was subject to the underwear bomber who boarded a plane in the Netherlands and flew to the US on Christmas day. ICTS was again in charge of security at the airport and failed to detect any explosives.

So this is what is has come to. In an effort to terrorize the American public and set up a police state, mentally ill, drugged up patsies get flown in to threaten Americans with the equivalent of firecrackers.

Booo.

America has a history of going to war. Often the incidents that triggered these wars were staged events designed to mobilize public opinion and whip up the bloodlust needed to fight them. This short video offers examples of how many times Americans have been tricked into fighting a war on behalf of America’s ruling class.

By Pepe Escobar
Sep 11, 2009

It’s September 11 all over again – eight years on. The George W Bush administration is out. The “global war on terror” is still on, renamed “overseas contingency operations” by the Barack Obama administration. Obama’s “new strategy” – a war escalation – is in play in AfPak. Osama bin Laden may be dead or not. “Al-Qaeda” remains a catch-all ghost entity. September 11 – the neo-cons’ “new Pearl Harbor” – remains the darkest jigsaw puzzle of the young 21st century.

It’s useless to expect US corporate media and the ruling elites’ political operatives to call for a true, in-depth investigation into the attacks on the US on September 11, 2001. Whitewash has been the norm. But even establishment highlight Dr Zbig “Grand Chessboard” Brzezinski, a former national security advisor, has admitted to the US Senate that the post-9/11 “war on terror” is a “mythical historical narrative”.

The following questions, some multi-part – and most totally ignored by the 9/11 Commission – are just the tip of the immense 9/11 iceberg. A hat tip goes to the indefatigable work of 911truth.org; whatreallyhappened.com; architects and engineers for 9/11 truth; the Italian documentary Zero: an investigation into 9/11; and Asia Times Online readers’ e-mails.

None of these questions has been convincingly answered – according to the official narrative. It’s up to US civil society to keep up the pressure. Eight years after the fact, one fundamental conclusion is imperative. The official narrative edifice of 9/11 is simply not acceptable.

Fifty questions

1) How come dead or not dead Osama bin Laden has not been formally indicted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as responsible for 9/11? Is it because the US government – as acknowledged by the FBI itself – has not produced a single conclusive piece of evidence?

2) How could all the alleged 19 razor-blade box cutter-equipped Muslim perpetrators have been identified in less than 72 hours – without even a crime scene investigation?

3) How come none of the 19’s names appeared on the passenger lists released the same day by both United Airlines and American Airlines?

4) How come eight names on the “original” FBI list happened to be found alive and living in different countries?

5) Why would pious jihadi Mohammed Atta leave a how-to-fly video manual, a uniform and his last will inside his bag knowing he was on a suicide mission?

Click here for the rest of the 50 questions about 9/11.
Click here for another 20 questions about 9/11.

Read more on the Explosive Truth about the WTC destruction

Better Tag Cloud