Skip to content

9/11 – A Cheap Magic Trick

How false flag attacks are manufactured by the world's elite.

Archive

Archive for November, 2010

Graeme MacQueen and Laurie Manwell are prominent researchers in the national 9/11 Truth movement, seeking to educate the public regarding the facts of September 11, 2001 and calling for a new and independent investigation. Graeme MacQueen is founder of the Centre for Peace Studies at McMaster University and now a retired professor from that university. Laurie Manwell is a professor at Guelph University in Neuroscience and Applied Cognitive Sciences. MacQueen and Manwell were in Bloomington for a public presentation called “Peace Through Truth: 9/11 and State Crimes Against Democracy”. During their visit they sat down with local 9/11 Truth advocate Byron Bangert for an exploration of fact vs. fiction and how fear colors our perceptions.

Click on link to hear the audio discussion The Truth About 9/11: Graeme MacQueen and Laurie Manwell

By Stephen C. Webster
Saturday, November 27th, 2010
Rawstory.com

Boy told undercover agents he could get a gun because he’s a “rapper”; authored article containing “jihad” workout tips

An Somali-born, American teenager was apparently set up by federal law enforcement officials who posed as radical Islamic fighters and lured the young man into a plot he believed would lead him to detonate a car bomb at an Oregon Christmas tree lighting ceremony.

The bomb, provided by FBI agents, was “inert” and did not pose a threat to public safety, according to the US Attorney’s Office in Oregon.

Oddly enough, Arthur Balizan, an FBI agent in Oregon, contradicted the US Attorney’s Office, suggesting that the threat posed by 19-year-old Mohamed Osman Mohamud “was very real.”

Except: “[At] every turn,” he explained, “we denied him the ability to actually carry out the attack.”

The story rings devastatingly familiar when stacked next to the tale of Hosam Maher Husein Smadi, a Jordanian man arrested in 2009, at age 19, for allegedly planning to detonate a car bomb in a Dallas skyscraper.

Each boy was led down the path to imagined violence by federal agents, with authorities ultimately providing fake bombs in both cases. Smadi and Mohamud, officials claim, expressed a desire to engage in terrorist attacks before agents began luring them in.

Click here for the rest of the story FBI apparently set up US teen blamed for fake car bomb

Click here for another analysis of the Christmas Tree bomber Clueless Patsy Set-up by FBI in Christmas Tree Bombing Plot

Press Release
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Colorado Public Television
Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup
Saturday, December 4 at 7:00 pm on Channel 12.1

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION:
With the departure of the Bush Administration and the arrival of an “era of transparency,” opportunities are arising for the disclosure of new information that may shed more light on the events that took place before and after 9/11/2001. This film takes viewers on a turbulent journey through several pivotal moments in history before delving into the most significant catastrophe in recent memory, 9/11. Loaded with powerful, new footage and in-depth interviews with the likes of Steven Earl Jones, an American physicist who has discovered undetonated explosive material in multiple samples of dust from the World Trade Center collapses, this documentary presents a wide array of evidence. The American people continue to live in the aftermath of 9/11 and deal with its ongoing repercussions. Is this just another machination of power on the timeline of history? If so, the real question is what happens next? Or better yet, what can we do to prevent another 9/11? LOOSE CHANGE 9/11 serves as a fundamental call to action which is fueled by hope that those affected by 9/11 will soon receive the answers that they have sought after for nearly a decade.

WHY CPT12 IS AIRING THIS FILM:
Last year, in response to numerous viewer requests, Colorado Public Television (CPT12) aired two independent films, 911 PRESS FOR TRUTH and 911 BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH. It was the United States’ broadcast television debut for each of these controversial films, both of which question the official reports of what happened surrounding the attacks on September 11, 2001.

Presented as part of CPT12’s fundraising efforts, the station interrupted each film’s broadcast to feature in-studio guests who discussed the films and the station’s mission of providing access to diverse and opposing viewpoints. The in-studio guests included Kyle Hence, Bob McIlvane, Ray Nowosielski and Richard Gage, AIA.

While both programs helped raise funds for Channel 12, their broadcasts were not without controversy. Our evening of 9/11 programming generated many comments from the press as well as a huge groundswell of feedback from CPT12 viewers and members.

Many viewers thanked the station for airing content that has been neglected by mainstream media – whether they agreed with the official story explaining the events of 9/11, the alternative theories presented in the films, or were undecided. In fact, we heard from people all over the country.

Some of the feedback included complaints about the program breaks and our in-studio guests – that the station was only presenting a one-sided view that supported the alternative theories of the “Truth Movement” or “Truthers.” While these two films did argue alternate theories, Colorado Public Television has also aired PBS programs focused on the official story of 9/11. These include NOVA’s “Why the Towers Fell” and “Building on Ground Zero” as well as AMERICAN EXPERIENCE’s “The Center of the World.”

Taking all feedback, criticisms and requests into account, Colorado Public Television is now airing LOOSE CHANGE 9/11: AN AMERICAN COUP.

Throughout the broadcast, the station will interrupt the program to discuss the film’s perspectives and to raise funds for Colorado Public Television. These program breaks will include multiple viewpoints – both for and against the film’s content. Guests will include Kevin Ryan, a 911 Whistleblower, plus a representative for the official story of 9/11. Additionally, we will air a range of comments from people in the community, comments from filmmakers Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe, and others.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
CPT12 provides a platform for discussion and encourages you to do your own research if you are interested in this subject matter. You can also share your comments and opinions, or read what others have to say at the bottom of this page.

9/11 Resources Supporting Alternative Theories:

•Military, Intelligence, and Government Patriots Question 9/11•Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth•Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice•Colorado 911 Visibility
9/11 Resources Supporting the Official Story:

•FEMA•The 9/11 Commission Report•NIST (National Institute of Standards & Technology) & the World Trade Center Fact Sheets•Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Read more on the Explosive Truth about the WTC Destruction

This is how ‘news’ gets planted. In the video clip below, a supposed freelancer for FOX News says he witnessed the 9/11 attack in New York. He then implants the idea that the WTC towers fell due to ‘structural failure’. How did he know this when the towers had just fallen? Was he a structural engineer who had done a thorough investigation? No. Was he an architect? No.

So how could he speak so authoritatively about an event that took place minutes before?

The answer is that he was hired to plant this information into the American consciousness so that they would accept the government’s lie – hook, line, and sinker – about what brought down the WTC buildings. Not only that, it was arranged for him to be interviewed immediately after the buildings fell so that this particular meme would be implanted and spread among the American population as the official explanation of what happened.

Read more on the Explosive Truth about the WTC Destruction

November 22, 2010
by Gordon Duff
Veterans Today

NO LONGER A THEORY
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

When both Judge Napolitano and Geraldo Rivera, biggest names on “fair and balanced” Fox News, agree that calling 9/11 a “wingnut conspiracy” was a mistake, you would expect more to happen. The government should be shaken to its roots, network after network should be picking up the story and something, anything, should be in the newspapers.

Instead, everyone, yes, everyone in the media, everyone in government, is pretending it didn’t happen, just hoping it will go away. The reason they are reacting this way is simple, if even part of 9/11 gets out, part of the easily proven truth, there can’t be enough unexpected “heart attacks’ and plane crashes to keep everything from crashing in.

9/11 is the key, the only story. The seeming conspiracy over 9/11 is so far reaching, so many could be involved and, as it seems, are involved. You can’t be a little bit pregnant or slightly dead. WTC 7, or “Building ‘What’” as it is called, simply can’t be explained. Instead, the biggest news story since the Kennedy assassination is being treated like a celebrity drunk driving arrest.

America is in two wars because of 9/11 and now we are told it was all a big mistake, the government “may” had done it but that’s just “water under the bridge,” or “forgive and forget.” No way, no how, we aren’t forgetting, no, we aren’t forgiving, not those who did it, not those who covered it up nor the press that lied through their teeth about it, no, inexorable to all but the real “wingnuts,” co-conspirators who need investigation.

BIGGEST “I TOLD YOU SO” IN HISTORY

At least Geraldo admitted he had been wrong. The others, how do they apologize for labeling 1.2 billion people as terrorists, years of rape, torture, secret prisons, wounded American soldiers treated like criminals? Those responsible, if things go as planned, will never have to stand before a judge and say;

“I’m sorry, I will never commit treason, war crimes and mass murder again.”

Is everything supposed to be treated like a college prank, the Bataan Death March, the Holocaust, the USS Liberty, the Nanking Massacre, the Mavi Marmara, Abu Gharib?

THE TONKIN GULF ANALOGY

America went to war in Vietnam over a lie. On April 2, 1964, the United States claimed one of its warships was attacked by four North Vietnamese patrol boats. The US claims it responded with air attacks and gunfire, driving off the P 4 patrol boats. Two days later, we were told another attack occurred. A preponderance of evidence has now proven this second attack was entirely fabricated, an attack used to push congress into giving broad war powers to the American president, powers that sent the United States to the most brutal military defeat in its history. A generation of American’s died in Vietnam, leaving a country to be led into decline by those who had “other priorities” than to serve.

Three years after the Tonkin Gulf incident, an almost identical attack;

■an American warship,
■torpedo boats (and aircraft),
■same president,
■same secretary of defense and
the same game, using presidential war powers behind the smoke screen of a “false flag” attack to get America into another war, this time in the Middle East.

What America had done, of course, was enter a pattern of behavior and a learning curve. The pattern would lead to more and more audacious “false flag” incidents and the learning curve would teach future leaders to prepare for this kind of thing as “routine.”

News media would become trained “lap dogs” and every potential snag, law enforcement, the courts, honest military and intelligence leaders, would have to be derailed. This all came together with the court appointment of George “W” Bush as president in 2001.

What immediately followed was utterly predictable, pieces were put in place and, just like clockwork:

9/11

THE USS LIBERTY INCIDENT, A STEPPING STONE TO 9/11

The ship, not the USS Maddox this time, was the USS Liberty and 271 of 296 crew members were killed or wounded. The attacker, supposedly Egypt, turned out to be Israelis who had agreed to sink the Liberty and murder the crew as part of a deal with President Lyndon Johnson who was having a torid affair with an Israeli secret agent.

The evidence, as presented on the videos and as evaluated by America’s top “mainstream” news, finally, after so many years, shows 9/11 to be another “Tonkin Gulf,” another “USS Liberty.”

9/11, it seems has even more in common with the Liberty incident, the cast of characters, the “attackers” may well have been Israeli, always trustworthy, always reliable and always available. As shown in the Lawson video, 5 were arrested under circumstances that leave no room for doubt regarding complicity.

WHAT IF, ANOTHER TONKIN GULF ANALOGY

In 1963, President John F. Kennedy was killed. The murder was covered up, little question about that. With Alan Dulles running the investigation, the man Kennedy fired from the CIA, what else could we expect? For years, blame has floated around and outrageous attempts to deflect blame, Oswald, the FBI, Cubans, Corsicans, a college prank gone wrong, the press never tires of them.

Last week, Geraldo, as seen on the video, forced to accept 9/11 as a government coverup, still is trying to work angles on the Kennedy assassination. Why?

Did the 1963 killing lead to the 1964 Tonkin Gulf incident and the Vietnam War as Oliver Stone’s JFK dramatizes or is Mordechai Vanunu correct and Israel’s Dimona nuke program and the 1967 War, including the USS Liberty ploy to bring the United States in, are the the reasons?

THE TONKIN GULF ANALOGY

America went to war in Vietnam over a lie. On April 2, 1964, the United States claimed one of its warships was attacked by four North Vietnamese patrol boats. The US claims it responded with air attacks and gunfire, driving off the P 4 patrol boats. Two days later, we were told another attack occurred. A preponderance of evidence has now proven this second attack was entirely fabricated, an attack used to push congress into giving broad war powers to the American president, powers that sent the United States to the most brutal military defeat in its history. A generation of American’s died in Vietnam, leaving a country to be led into decline by those who had “other priorities” than to serve.

Three years after the Tonkin Gulf incident, an almost identical attack;

■an American warship,
■torpedo boats (and aircraft),
■same president,
■same secretary of defense and
the same game, using presidential war powers behind the smoke screen of a “false flag” attack to get America into another war, this time in the Middle East.

What America had done, of course, was enter a pattern of behavior and a learning curve. The pattern would lead to more and more audacious “false flag” incidents and the learning curve would teach future leaders to prepare for this kind of thing as “routine.”

News media would become trained “lap dogs” and every potential snag, law enforcement, the courts, honest military and intelligence leaders, would have to be derailed. This all came together with the court appointment of George “W” Bush as president in 2001.

What immediately followed was utterly predictable, pieces were put in place and, just like clockwork:

9/11
THE USS LIBERTY INCIDENT, A STEPPING STONE TO 9/11

The ship, not the USS Maddox this time, was the USS Liberty and 271 of 296 crew members were killed or wounded. The attacker, supposedly Egypt, turned out to be Israelis who had agreed to sink the Liberty and murder the crew as part of a deal with President Lyndon Johnson who was having a torid affair with an Israeli secret agent.

The evidence, as presented on the videos and as evaluated by America’s top “mainstream” news, finally, after so many years, shows 9/11 to be another “Tonkin Gulf,” another “USS Liberty.”

9/11, it seems has even more in common with the Liberty incident, the cast of characters, the “attackers” may well have been Israeli, always trustworthy, always reliable and always available. As shown in the Lawson video, 5 were arrested under circumstances that leave no room for doubt regarding complicity.

WHAT IF, ANOTHER TONKIN GULF ANALOGY

In 1963, President John F. Kennedy was killed. The murder was covered up, little question about that. With Alan Dulles running the investigation, the man Kennedy fired from the CIA, what else could we expect? For years, blame has floated around and outrageous attempts to deflect blame, Oswald, the FBI, Cubans, Corsicans, a college prank gone wrong, the press never tires of them.

Last week, Geraldo, as seen on the video, forced to accept 9/11 as a government coverup, still is trying to work angles on the Kennedy assassination. Why?

Did the 1963 killing lead to the 1964 Tonkin Gulf incident and the Vietnam War as Oliver Stone’s JFK dramatizes or is Mordechai Vanunu correct and Israel’s Dimona nuke program and the 1967 War, including the USS Liberty ploy to bring the United States in, are the the reasons?

Lyndon B. Johnson, Gulf of Tonkin 'decider'

Was 9/11 just another step in a list of tragedies, an American political leadership continually embroiled in plots and conspiracies, the “October surprise, the “under the table” deal cut with Iran over the hostages or “Iran Contra,” Reagans drug and gun trades. How many financial conspiracies have been uncovered, BCCI, the Savings and Loan collapse and the series still going on today? Are they connected or are they all proof that the business of government is and has been conspiracy, not just today but for decades?

Read more on the Explosive Truth about the WTC Destruction

Forty seven years ago today, President John Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas.

His alleged assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was quickly arrested and then shot by Jack Ruby two days later. Before being killed, Oswald denied having anything to do with the shooting and claimed he was a patsy. Documents revealed by the CIA (see below) show that Oswald was a longtime government agent. He was set up to be the fall guy for the assassination and then quickly killed before he could talk.


The Warren Commission, headed by Chief Justice Earl Warren, concluded that Oswald was the lone assassin. That closed the book on the ‘official investigation’.

However subsequent independent investigations and testimony by former FBI and CIA agents along with evidence provided by others, have established that Oswald did not kill Kennedy.

Instead a wide ranging conspiracy involving people in government, business, banking, and organized crime were involved in this ‘political hit’.

Those who conspired to kill Kennedy included Vice President Lyndon Johnson, CIA head Allen Dulles, Prescott Bush, George H. Bush, Jimmy Hoffa, Bill Decker (Sheriff of Dallas County), FBI head J. Edgar Hoover, oilman Clint Murchison, David Sanchez Morales (CIA hitman), John McCloy (Chair of the Chase Manhattan Bank and later a member of the Warren Commission), George Brown of Brown and Root, Amon G. Carter Jr. (owner of the Fort Worth Star Telegram newspaper), Richard Nixon, Clyde Tolson (J. Edgar Hoover’s boyfriend and Associate Director of the FBI), Earle Cabell (mayor of Dallas and brother of Charles Cabell who was Deputy Director of the CIA), Governor John Connally, Malcolm Wallace, Cliff Carter (National Director of the Democratic National Committee), the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, and members of organized crime including Sam Giancana, Carlos Marcello, and Jack Ruby.  While there were other parties involved, these are the main figures.

According to Robert Gaylon Ross, who wrote a book about the assassination called The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK, there were six shooters in Dallas that day and Lee Harvey Oswald wasn’t one of them. He states the CIA provided the guns for the assassination.

Below is Part 1 of an interview of Robert Gaylon Ross discussing his book.

Other information has come forward from former FBI agent Don Adams who has testified that different locations were considered for the assassination of Kennedy. One was in Palm Beach, Florida.  A backup site was in Washington DC. The third and last chance to kill Kennedy was in Dallas. In the interview below, Adams describes the information he discovered early on regarding the plot to kill Kennedy in Florida.

In a videotaped deposition before her death, Madeline Brown, Lyndon Johnson’s mistress, discusses who was present in Dallas the night before the assassination to plan the cover up story. The meeting was held at the home of Clint Murchison. Afterwards, Lyndon Johnson told Brown that “those SOB’s” would never embarrass him again. That’s no threat – that’s a promise.”

Everyone who was in on the plot wanted Kennedy dead but often for different reasons. Lyndon Johnson hated the Kennedys because he suspected that John Kennedy would drop him as his running mate when Kennedy ran for re-election. He also feared that Robert Kennedy would prosecute him for the kickbacks Johnson was receiving. Organized crime hated the Kennedys because Robert Kennedy intended to use the law to eradicate them. Bankers and businessmen resented John Kennedy because he wanted to withdraw American troops from Southeast Asia. Doing so would cut into the profits of the military industrial complex and the bankers since they were the ones earning interest on the money loaned to the government to fight the wars. The CIA wanted Kennedy gone after he fired Allen Dulles and other top CIA officials for the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Kennedy also expressed a desire to “splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.” J. Edgar Hoover hated the Kennedys – and especially Robert Kennedy – because he resented their intrusion into his turf and because he was closely tied to organized crime himself. The oilmen wanted Kennedy gone because he wanted to end the oil depletion allowance which would have cost them hundreds of millions of dollars. Zionists Jews wanted Kennedy killed because of the banking connection, his wanting to bring an end to organized crime (many of biggest crime families in America are Jewish) and because Kennedy was opposed to Israel having nuclear weapons. Click on link for the article Israel killed JFK, says Vanunu

Once Kennedy was killed, the Vietnam war was continued and expanded – enriching companies like Brown and Root. The War on Poverty was initiated which greatly expanded the welfare state and the government’s intrusion into the lives of people. Unconstitutional legislation and Supreme Court rulings undermined the rule of law and the Bill of Rights. (Earl Warren agreed to chair the Warren Commission because J. Edgar Hoover threatened to reveal publicly some very damaging information about Warren according to the book Family of Secrets by Russ Baker.) The State of Israel continued to prosper at America’s expense as the Zionists effectively took control of this country’s foreign policy. And the fact that Kennedy was murdered and no one was ever held to account underscored the fact that you could get away with murder in America if you were rich enough and powerful enough.

Five years later Robert Kennedy was murdered by the same people. He knew the only way to find out the extent of the conspiracy was to become president. The people who killed his brother made sure that never happened.

Click on link for article Who Killed JFK?

Three Points of Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe that Anyone Can Understand

by Jim Hoffman
Version 1.0, April 26, 2009

Introduction

The scientific paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe provides, quite simply, proof that explosives were used in the destruction of the Twin Towers. Specifically, the paper positively identifies an advanced engineered pyrotechnic material in each of several samples of dust from the destroyed skyscrapers, in the form of tiny chips having red and gray sides and sharing a very specific three-dimensional structure, chemical composition, and ignition behavior.

The basis and validity of this identification can be grasped quickly by anyone with a working knowledge of physics and chemistry. They need only read the paper’s one-page conclusion, and perhaps its section describing the provenance of the dust samples.

But what of the reader whose strong suit isn’t the hard sciences? Does one have to be an expert to understand the findings and evaluate the many claims thrown up by “debunkers” to dismiss those findings?

Fortunately, the answer is no. The central observations of the paper can be understood by any intelligent person with some effort. In this thumbnail summary of the paper’s findings, I focus on three easy-to-remember features of the red-gray chips established by the paper — features that undeniably show that the chips are a high-tech engineered pyrotechnic material. Because my description includes some technical language, I have provided a glossary for the benefit of the non-technical reader.

Click on the link for the rest of the paper Thermitic Pyrotechnics in the WTC Made Simple

Read more on the Explosive Truth about the WTC Destruction

by Kevin Ryan
November 18, 2010
Foreign Policy Journal

Just after September 11th 2001, many governments began investigations into possible insider trading related to the terrorist attacks of that day. Such investigations were initiated by the governments of Belgium, Cyprus, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Monte Carlo, the Netherlands, Switzerland, the United States, and others. Although the investigators were clearly concerned about insider trading, and considerable evidence did exist, none of the investigations resulted in a single indictment. That’s because the people identified as having been involved in the suspicious trades were seen as unlikely to have been associated with those alleged to have committed the 9/11 crimes.

This is an example of the circular logic often used by those who created the official explanations for 9/11. The reasoning goes like this: if we assume that we know who the perpetrators were (i.e. the popular version of “al Qaeda”) and those who were involved in the trades did not appear to be connected to those assumed perpetrators, then insider trading did not occur.

That’s basically what the 9/11 Commission told us. The Commission concluded that “exhaustive investigations” by the SEC and the FBI “uncovered no evidence that anyone with advance knowledge of the attacks profited through securities transactions.” What they meant was that someone did profit through securities transactions but, based on the Commission’s assumptions of guilt, those who profited were not associated with those who were guilty of conducting the attacks. In a footnote, the Commission report acknowledged “highly suspicious trading on its face,” but said that this trading on United Airlines was traced back to “A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda.”[1]

With respect to insider trading, or what is more technically called informed trading, the Commission report was itself suspect for several reasons. First, the informed trades relating to 9/11 covered far more than just airline company stock. The stocks of financial and reinsurance companies, as well as other financial vehicles, were identified as being associated with suspicious trades. Huge credit card transactions, completed just before the attacks, were also involved. The Commission ultimately tried to frame all of this highly suspicious trading in terms of a series of misunderstandings. However, the possibility that so many leading financial experts were so completely wrong is doubtful at best and, if true, would constitute another unbelievable scenario in the already highly improbable sequence of events represented by the official story of 9/11.

In the last few years, new evidence has come to light on these matters. In 2006 and 2010, financial experts at a number of universities have established new evidence, through statistical analyses, that informed trades did occur with respect to the 9/11 attacks. Additionally, in 2007, the 911 Commission released a memorandum summary of the FBI investigations on which its report was based.[2] A careful review of this memorandum indicates that some of the people who were briefly investigated by the FBI, and then acquitted without due diligence, had links to al Qaeda and to US intelligence agencies. Although the elapsed time between the informed trades and these new confirmations might prevent legal action against the guilty, the facts of the matter can help lead us to the truth about 9/11.

Click for more of Evidence for Informed Trading on the Attacks of September 11

On this week’s “9/11 In Context” show, which airs Thursday, Nov. 18, at 3pm ET, I will interview Kevin Ryan about his important research into the WTC physical evidence, especially the WTC dust, as well as his remarkable investigations into the complex network of corporate tenants of the WTC and the select group of “experts” who repeatedly surface to defend the official account of the buildings’ destruction.

Kevin is one of the most productive researchers in the 9/11 truth movement. He brings together his extensive experience as a professional chemist, the capability to penetrate obscure corporate and professional networks, and a deep sense of moral obligation to uncover the truth about the 9/11 events. Don’t miss this interview! It is sure to be worthwhile.

Listen live at: Kevin Ryan on “9/11 In Context”

or listen to the mp3 which is available at the same link right after the broadcast.

And check out the other programs on the Resistance Radio Network, all at 3pm ET, at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/resistanceradio:

Monday: Globalism The Full Spectrum with Travinyle1

Tuesday: WideShut Webcast: Keelan Balderson

Friday: The MistrBrit Show

Sunday: The Eyevolution Continues: Lee Woudberg

Better Tag Cloud