Did you know 2013 was a breakthrough year in our efforts to hold NIST accountable?

For years we have known that Building 7 came down in free-fall and that the NIST report failed to explain why. We knew that NIST’s collapse model looked nothing like the actual collapse, and that NIST’s “probable collapse sequence” was anything but probable.

But in 2013, NIST’s explanation went from highly improbable to absolutely impossible, thanks to the discovery that NIST deliberately omitted critical structural features from its model – features that make the supposed collapse initiation impossible. With this new discovery, we have the evidence to prove definitively that Building 7 could not have collapsed as NIST says it did.

Now AE911Truth is leading efforts to hold NIST accountable for this inexplicable omission. In December, renowned lawyer William Pepper wrote the Department of Commerce Inspector General on behalf of AE911Truth to request an investigation into the misconduct. In 2014, AE911Truth will begin pursuing legal avenues to require correction of the NIST report and holding NIST investigators personally accountable.

Read more